Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats: Complete Game Analysis, Key Performances, and Team Comparison
The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears match player stats provide a detailed look at one of the NFL’s historic interconference matchups. Both teams are known for their defensive traditions, physical playing styles, and passionate supporters. When these franchises meet, individual performances from quarterbacks, running backs, receivers, and defensive players often determine the result.
The Steelers and Bears faced each other on November 23, 2025, at Soldier Field in Chicago. The Bears secured a 31–28 victory in a competitive game that featured strong quarterback performances, important turnovers, and several momentum changes. This article examines the game’s key player statistics, offensive production, defensive contributions, team comparisons, and the factors that influenced the final score.
Quick Facts: Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Match | Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears |
| Sport | American Football |
| League | National Football League (NFL) |
| Conference | Steelers: AFC; Bears: NFC |
| Match date | November 23, 2025 |
| Venue | Soldier Field |
| Location | Chicago, Illinois, USA |
| Home team | Chicago Bears |
| Away team | Pittsburgh Steelers |
| Final score | Chicago Bears 31, Pittsburgh Steelers 28 |
| Steelers head coach | Mike Tomlin |
| Bears head coach | Ben Johnson |
| Playing format | Four 15-minute quarters |
| Team nationality | United States |
| Competition type | NFL regular season |
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Match Overview
The November 23, 2025, meeting between Pittsburgh and Chicago delivered an entertaining contest between two teams with different offensive approaches. Chicago relied on explosive passing plays and timely defensive contributions, while Pittsburgh used a combination of rushing attacks and short-to-intermediate passing to move the football.
The game remained competitive because both teams were able to produce scoring drives. However, Chicago made better use of important opportunities and protected its advantage during the closing stages. The three-point margin reflected how closely the teams competed throughout the afternoon.
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats
Individual statistics help explain why Chicago finished ahead despite Pittsburgh’s competitive offensive performance. Quarterback production, rushing efficiency, receiving yards, sacks, and turnovers were especially important.
The following sections examine the main contributors and how their performances affected the game. Passing numbers show each team’s ability to move the ball through the air, while rushing and receiving performances highlight offensive balance. Defensive statistics also matter because a single turnover or pressure play can change the direction of a close NFL contest.
Quarterback Performance Comparison
| Player | Team | Completions/Attempts | Passing Yards | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | Bears | 19/35 | 239 | 3 | 0 |
| Mason Rudolph | Steelers | 24/31 | 171 | 1 | 1 |
Caleb Williams played an important role in Chicago’s victory. He completed 19 of 35 passes for 239 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception. His passer rating of 104.3 reflected his ability to produce scoring plays despite completing fewer than 55 percent of his attempts. Williams connected with multiple receivers and made effective decisions near the end zone. His touchdown passes helped Chicago recover from Pittsburgh’s first-half advantage and build a lead that ultimately proved enough to win.
Mason Rudolph started at quarterback for Pittsburgh and completed 24 of 31 passes for 171 yards. He threw one touchdown and one interception, finishing with an 86.9 passer rating. Rudolph demonstrated accuracy on shorter throws and helped Pittsburgh maintain possession through several sustained drives. However, Chicago limited his opportunities for major passing gains. Although his completion percentage was higher than Williams’, Pittsburgh’s passing attack generated fewer yards and touchdowns, showing why efficiency must be considered alongside scoring production.
Pittsburgh Steelers Rushing Player Stats
Pittsburgh’s running game was one of its strongest offensive areas. The Steelers accumulated 186 rushing yards on 36 attempts, averaging approximately 5.2 yards per carry. Kenneth Gainwell and Jaylen Warren were the main contributors, giving Pittsburgh opportunities to control possession and advance the ball without relying entirely on passing. Their rushing production helped the Steelers finish with more total offensive yards than Chicago. However, strong rushing statistics alone were not enough to secure victory.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Gainwell | 10 | 92 | 0 |
| Jaylen Warren | 18 | 68 | 1 |
| DK Metcalf | 2 | 12 | 1 |
| Mason Rudolph | 3 | 7 | 0 |
| Jonnu Smith | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Connor Heyward | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 186 | 2 |
Kenneth Gainwell produced Pittsburgh’s longest rushing play of the game, a 55-yard gain. He averaged 9.2 yards per carry and demonstrated how a running back can influence field position with a single explosive run. Jaylen Warren provided a more consistent workload, carrying the ball 18 times and scoring on a one-yard rushing touchdown. DK Metcalf also contributed an unusual rushing score, demonstrating Pittsburgh’s willingness to use offensive players in different situations.
Chicago Bears Rushing Player Stats
Chicago recorded 99 rushing yards on 25 attempts, averaging 4.0 yards per carry. The Bears did not match Pittsburgh’s rushing production, but their ground game provided enough support to maintain offensive balance. Kyle Monangai led the team in rushing yards and scored an important fourth-quarter touchdown. Caleb Williams also contributed with his mobility, adding useful yards when passing opportunities were limited. Chicago’s rushing performance showed that a team does not necessarily need to dominate on the ground to win.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Monangai | 12 | 48 | 1 |
| Caleb Williams | 4 | 21 | 0 |
| D’Andre Swift | 8 | 15 | 0 |
| Luther Burden III | 1 | 15 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 99 | 1 |
Monangai’s two-yard touchdown run early in the fourth quarter extended Chicago’s lead to 31–21. That score became especially important when Pittsburgh later responded with another touchdown. Williams added 21 rushing yards on four attempts, giving the Bears another way to move the football. Luther Burden III contributed a 15-yard rushing play, while D’Andre Swift gained 15 yards on eight carries. The overall rushing numbers were modest, but Chicago made effective use of its opportunities near the goal line.
Pittsburgh Steelers Receiving Player Stats
Pittsburgh spread its passing production across several offensive players. Kenneth Gainwell led the team with six receptions, while Calvin Austin III contributed the most receiving yards. Tight ends Pat Freiermuth and Darnell Washington also played useful roles in the passing attack. Rather than depending on one receiver for most of its production, Pittsburgh used shorter passes to involve multiple targets. This approach helped Rudolph maintain a high completion percentage, although the team struggled to generate long passing plays consistently.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calvin Austin III | 4 | 36 | 0 |
| Kenneth Gainwell | 6 | 30 | 0 |
| DK Metcalf | 5 | 22 | 0 |
| Darnell Washington | 2 | 22 | 0 |
| Ben Skowronek | 1 | 21 | 0 |
| Jonnu Smith | 3 | 21 | 0 |
| Pat Freiermuth | 3 | 19 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 171 | 1 |
Pat Freiermuth scored Pittsburgh’s only passing touchdown on a three-yard reception from Mason Rudolph during the fourth quarter. That touchdown reduced Chicago’s lead to three points and kept the Steelers within reach. Gainwell’s six receptions also demonstrated his value beyond rushing, while Austin provided additional receiving production. Pittsburgh’s receivers generally gained fewer yards per catch than Chicago’s main targets, making it harder for the Steelers to create quick scoring opportunities through the air.
Chicago Bears Receiving Player Stats
Chicago’s receiving group played a major role in the result. DJ Moore scored twice, while Colston Loveland added another receiving touchdown. Rome Odunze and Luther Burden III contributed important yardage, helping Williams distribute the football across several options. The Bears produced 239 gross passing yards, significantly more than Pittsburgh’s 171. Their ability to connect on productive passing plays created scoring opportunities and helped overcome the Steelers’ advantage in rushing yards.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|
| DJ Moore | 5 | 64 | 2 |
| Rome Odunze | 3 | 53 | 0 |
| Colston Loveland | 4 | 49 | 1 |
| Luther Burden III | 3 | 46 | 0 |
| D’Andre Swift | 1 | 14 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Durham Smythe | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 239 | 3 |
DJ Moore was particularly effective in scoring situations. His five-yard touchdown reception opened the scoring, and his 25-yard touchdown catch in the third quarter gave Chicago the lead. Loveland added four receptions for 49 yards, including a 12-yard touchdown. Odunze averaged approximately 17.7 yards per reception, demonstrating his ability to gain meaningful yardage when targeted. Together, these performances gave Chicago an advantage in passing touchdowns and offensive explosiveness.
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Defensive Player Stats
Defensive plays were important throughout the contest, especially because both teams experienced turnovers. Pittsburgh recovered two Chicago fumbles, while the Bears recovered one Pittsburgh fumble and intercepted Mason Rudolph once. These plays created changes in possession and influenced field position. Nick Herbig produced one of Pittsburgh’s biggest defensive moments by recovering a fumble in the end zone for a touchdown. Chicago’s defense responded with its own takeaways, helping the Bears remain competitive despite allowing substantial rushing yardage.
T.J. Watt and Yahya Black were involved in forcing fumbles for Pittsburgh, while Montez Sweat and Nick Kalinic contributed to Chicago’s forced-fumble production. Nahshon Wright recorded the game’s interception for the Bears. These individual contributions show why defensive statistics cannot be measured only through tackles or sacks. Recoveries, forced turnovers, and interceptions can have an immediate effect on the scoreboard, especially when two teams finish separated by only three points.
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
| Statistic | Pittsburgh Steelers | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 28 | 31 |
| Total net yards | 345 | 328 |
| First downs | 22 | 19 |
| Rushing yards | 186 | 99 |
| Net passing yards | 159 | 229 |
| Passing touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Interceptions thrown | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles lost | 1 | 2 |
| Sacks allowed | 2 | 1 |
| Third-down conversions | 8/14 | 7/13 |
| Penalties | 6 | 7 |
| Penalty yards | 41 | 83 |
| Time of possession | 33:09 | 26:51 |
The team comparison reveals an interesting result. Pittsburgh gained more total yards, earned more first downs, and controlled possession for longer. The Steelers also performed better on the ground and committed fewer penalty yards. Chicago, however, produced more net passing yards and scored three passing touchdowns. These differences explain why the Bears were able to win without leading every statistical category. Their passing efficiency in scoring situations outweighed Pittsburgh’s advantages in several other areas.
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | Steelers | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| First quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Second quarter | 14 | 10 |
| Third quarter | 0 | 7 |
| Fourth quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Final | 28 | 31 |
First Quarter
Chicago opened the scoring with a five-yard touchdown pass from Caleb Williams to DJ Moore. Pittsburgh answered late in the quarter when DK Metcalf scored on a six-yard rushing play. Both teams finished the opening period with seven points, establishing an evenly matched contest. Chicago showed its passing potential early, while Pittsburgh demonstrated offensive flexibility. The first quarter provided an early indication that both teams could reach the end zone using different approaches.
Second Quarter
Pittsburgh gained momentum early in the second quarter when Nick Herbig recovered a fumble in the end zone for a defensive touchdown. Chicago responded with a 12-yard touchdown pass from Williams to Colston Loveland. Jaylen Warren then scored on a one-yard run to restore Pittsburgh’s advantage. Cairo Santos added a 47-yard field goal as the half ended, reducing the Steelers’ lead to 21–17. Pittsburgh entered halftime ahead, but Chicago remained close enough to respond.
Third Quarter
The third quarter proved important because Chicago took control of the scoreboard. Williams connected with DJ Moore for a 25-yard touchdown, putting the Bears ahead 24–21. Pittsburgh failed to score during the period despite its earlier offensive success. Chicago’s ability to produce another passing touchdown showed the effectiveness of its quarterback-receiver connection. The Bears entered the fourth quarter with a narrow advantage and an opportunity to extend their lead.
Fourth Quarter
Kyle Monangai scored on a two-yard run early in the fourth quarter, extending Chicago’s advantage to 31–21. Pittsburgh continued fighting and responded when Mason Rudolph found Pat Freiermuth for a three-yard touchdown with 6:27 remaining. The Steelers reduced the deficit to 31–28 but could not complete the comeback. Chicago preserved its three-point lead through the final minutes, securing a victory built on productive passing plays and important scoring opportunities.
Key Players Who Influenced the Result
Caleb Williams was one of the most influential players because he accounted for three passing touchdowns without an interception. DJ Moore also delivered a standout performance, scoring twice and leading Chicago in receiving yards. For Pittsburgh, Kenneth Gainwell provided the most explosive rushing contribution, while Jaylen Warren supplied steady carries and a touchdown. Nick Herbig’s defensive score was another major highlight. Each of these players influenced the game differently, demonstrating how offensive and defensive contributions combine to shape an NFL result.
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Historical Rivalry
The Steelers and Bears are among the NFL’s most established franchises. Chicago was founded in 1920 as the Decatur Staleys before later becoming the Bears, while Pittsburgh entered the league in 1933. Both organizations developed strong reputations through defensive football and championship success. Their meetings are less frequent than divisional rivalries because Pittsburgh competes in the AFC North and Chicago plays in the NFC North. Nevertheless, games between them attract interest because of their long histories and recognizable football identities.
Interesting Facts About the Match
The November 2025 matchup included several noteworthy statistical details. Pittsburgh outgained Chicago by 17 total yards but still lost by three points. The Steelers controlled possession for more than 33 minutes, while the Bears held the football for less than 27 minutes. Chicago also committed more penalties and lost more fumbles. Despite these disadvantages, the Bears won because their offense produced three passing touchdowns and made important scoring plays at the right moments.
Another interesting detail was the difference between the quarterbacks’ completion percentages. Mason Rudolph completed approximately 77.4 percent of his passes, compared with Caleb Williams’ 54.3 percent. However, Williams threw for 68 more yards and two additional touchdowns. This contrast highlights the importance of looking beyond completion percentage when evaluating quarterback performance. Chicago’s passing game generated more scoring production, while Pittsburgh’s offense relied more heavily on sustained drives and rushing success.
What the Match Result Means for Both Teams
Chicago’s victory demonstrated the value of productive passing plays and converting opportunities into touchdowns. The Bears managed to overcome disadvantages in rushing yards, possession time, and total offensive yardage. For Pittsburgh, the loss showed that strong rushing production and possession control do not always guarantee success. The Steelers generated enough offense to remain competitive but could not overcome Chicago’s scoring advantage. The game offered both teams useful lessons about execution, defensive discipline, and finishing important drives.
Conclusion
The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears match player stats show how Chicago earned a narrow 31–28 victory on November 23, 2025. Caleb Williams led the Bears with 239 passing yards and three touchdowns, while DJ Moore scored twice. Pittsburgh received strong rushing performances from Kenneth Gainwell and Jaylen Warren, along with a defensive touchdown from Nick Herbig.
Although Pittsburgh led in total yards, rushing production, first downs, and possession time, Chicago’s passing touchdowns made the difference. The matchup demonstrated that converting opportunities into points is often more important than dominating individual statistical categories.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears match?
The Chicago Bears defeated the Pittsburgh Steelers 31–28 on November 23, 2025, at Soldier Field in Chicago. The Bears scored four touchdowns and one field goal, while Pittsburgh scored four touchdowns. Chicago protected its narrow lead during the closing stages of the game.
2. Who had the most passing yards in the Steelers vs Bears game?
Caleb Williams led both teams with 239 passing yards. He completed 19 of 35 attempts, threw three touchdown passes, and recorded no interceptions. Pittsburgh quarterback Mason Rudolph finished with 171 passing yards, one touchdown, and one interception.
3. Who was the leading rusher in the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears match?
Kenneth Gainwell led all players with 92 rushing yards on 10 carries. His longest run covered 55 yards, and he averaged 9.2 yards per attempt. Jaylen Warren added 68 rushing yards and a touchdown for Pittsburgh.
4. Which player scored the most touchdowns in the match?
DJ Moore led the receiving players with two touchdowns for Chicago. He caught five passes for 64 yards, including touchdown receptions of five and 25 yards. His scoring contributions played an important role in the Bears’ victory.
5. Which team had better overall statistics in the Steelers vs Bears game?
Pittsburgh led in total offensive yards, rushing yards, first downs, and possession time. Chicago performed better in net passing yards and passing touchdowns. Although the Steelers led several statistical categories, the Bears were more effective at converting their passing opportunities into points and won 31–28.
See more amazing Information visit Novira Magazine
