Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Full Box Score, Highlights and Analysis
The Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats reveal how Chicago secured a dramatic 25-24 victory in Week 6 of the 2025 NFL season. Played on October 13, 2025, at Northwest Stadium, the Monday Night Football game featured impressive performances from quarterbacks Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels. Chicago won with a 38-yard field goal from Jake Moody as time expired, ending a contest filled with touchdowns, turnovers, and changing momentum.
Caleb Williams recorded 252 passing yards and one passing touchdown, while Jayden Daniels finished with 211 passing yards and three touchdowns. D’Andre Swift also delivered an outstanding performance with 108 rushing yards and 67 receiving yards. The Bears gained 386 total net yards compared with Washington’s 329, but the outcome remained uncertain until the final play. Below is a detailed breakdown of the confirmed player statistics, scoring plays, team comparisons, and moments that decided the game.
Quick Facts
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Match | Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders |
| Competition | National Football League (NFL) |
| Season | 2025 |
| Week | Week 6 |
| Match date | October 13, 2025 |
| Venue | Northwest Stadium |
| Location | Landover, Maryland, USA |
| Final score | Chicago Bears 25, Washington Commanders 24 |
| Winning team | Chicago Bears |
| Bears head coach | Ben Johnson |
| Commanders head coach | Dan Quinn |
| Chicago quarterback | Caleb Williams |
| Washington quarterback | Jayden Daniels |
| Top rushing performer | D’Andre Swift — 108 yards |
| Most passing touchdowns | Jayden Daniels — 3 |
| Winning play | Jake Moody’s 38-yard field goal |
| Attendance | 64,457 |
| Broadcast | Monday Night Football on ABC |
Game details verified against official Bears records and historical NFL box scores.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Overview
The Bears entered the matchup with a chance to build momentum under head coach Ben Johnson. Washington, led by Dan Quinn, wanted to protect its home field against a Chicago offense developing around Caleb Williams. Both teams had talented young quarterbacks, capable receivers, and defensive players who could change the direction of a game. Their meeting was particularly interesting because Washington had defeated Chicago the previous season with a last-second touchdown pass. The 2025 rematch offered the Bears an opportunity to reverse that result.
Chicago controlled much of the opening half and established an early 13-0 lead. Washington responded through its passing game and eventually moved ahead in the second half. Jayden Daniels connected with multiple receivers for touchdowns, while Chicago relied on efficient rushing, explosive passing plays, and field goals. The Commanders appeared positioned to win after taking a 24-16 fourth-quarter lead. However, a long touchdown reception by Swift and a late Washington turnover created the opportunity for Chicago to complete its comeback.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Final Score by Quarter
| Quarter | Chicago Bears | Washington Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| First | 6 | 0 |
| Second | 7 | 7 |
| Third | 3 | 10 |
| Fourth | 9 | 7 |
| Final | 25 | 24 |
Chicago started stronger, scoring twice through Jake Moody’s field goals during the first quarter. The Bears increased their lead with a Caleb Williams rushing touchdown early in the second. Washington recovered with a touchdown pass to Chris Moore and then outscored Chicago in the third quarter. The Commanders continued their comeback in the fourth, taking an eight-point lead before Swift’s long receiving touchdown. Moody eventually completed the Bears’ comeback with his fourth successful field goal of the night.
Chicago Bears Player Stats: Complete Offensive Breakdown
The Bears received valuable contributions from several offensive players, but Caleb Williams and D’Andre Swift produced the most important numbers. Williams provided accurate passing and a short rushing touchdown, while Swift gained yards through both rushing and receiving. Chicago’s receivers also contributed catches that extended drives and created scoring chances. Rather than depending on one player, the Bears distributed the ball across several options. Their ability to combine rushing production with timely passing helped them remain competitive when Washington took control of the scoreboard.
Chicago Bears Passing Stats
| Player | Comp/Att | Passing Yards | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | 17/29 | 252 | 1 | 0 |
Caleb Williams completed 17 of his 29 passes for 252 yards, finishing with one passing touchdown and no interceptions. His passer rating was 98.6, reflecting an effective performance despite facing defensive pressure. Williams was sacked three times, but he continued to create scoring opportunities for Chicago. His most important completion was the 55-yard touchdown pass to Swift in the fourth quarter. That play brought the Bears within two points and gave them a realistic chance to win the game.
Chicago Bears Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| D’Andre Swift | 14 | 108 | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 5 | 19 | 0 |
| DJ Moore | 2 | 10 | 0 |
| Roschon Johnson | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Caleb Williams | 4 | 3 | 1 |
D’Andre Swift led Chicago’s rushing attack with 108 yards on only 14 carries, averaging approximately 7.7 yards per attempt. His ability to find openings helped the Bears advance downfield and maintain offensive balance. Kyle Monangai added 19 yards on five carries, while Williams scored Chicago’s first touchdown on a one-yard run. Although Swift did not score a rushing touchdown, his consistent production became particularly important during the final drive, when the Bears needed to move into field-goal range without making a mistake.
Chicago Bears Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| D’Andre Swift | 2 | 67 | 1 |
| Luther Burden III | 4 | 51 | 0 |
| DJ Moore | 3 | 42 | 0 |
| Rome Odunze | 2 | 32 | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 1 | 25 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 2 | 24 | 0 |
| Colston Loveland | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Swift also led Chicago in receiving yards, collecting 67 yards on two catches. His 55-yard touchdown reception became the team’s biggest offensive play of the second half. Luther Burden III contributed four receptions for 51 yards, making him the Bears’ leading receiver by catches. DJ Moore gained 42 yards on three receptions, while Rome Odunze added 32 yards. The variety of contributors showed that Chicago could move the ball without directing every pass toward the same receiver.
Washington Commanders Player Stats: Complete Offensive Breakdown
Washington’s offensive performance centered on Jayden Daniels, whose passing helped the Commanders overcome Chicago’s early advantage. Daniels threw three touchdown passes to three different receivers and also contributed significant rushing yardage. Jacory Croskey-Merritt handled the largest share of Washington’s rushing attempts, while veteran tight end Zach Ertz played an important role in the passing attack. Although the Commanders scored touchdowns on several impressive drives, turnovers prevented them from protecting their fourth-quarter lead. Their offensive production was effective in important moments but ultimately fell short of Chicago’s total.
Washington Commanders Passing Stats
| Player | Comp/Att | Passing Yards | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden Daniels | 19/26 | 211 | 3 | 1 |
Jayden Daniels completed 19 of 26 passes for 211 yards and three touchdowns, recording a passer rating of 119.2. His passing accuracy helped Washington sustain drives and attack Chicago’s defense through different receiving options. Daniels connected with Chris Moore, Luke McCaffrey, and Zach Ertz for touchdowns, demonstrating his ability to find targets across the field. However, his one interception and Washington’s problems protecting possession were significant. Despite recording more passing touchdowns than Williams, Daniels finished on the losing side of the one-point result.
Washington Commanders Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | 17 | 61 | 0 |
| Jayden Daniels | 10 | 52 | 0 |
| Jaylin Lane | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Jeremy McNichols | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Deebo Samuel | 1 | -1 | 0 |
Jacory Croskey-Merritt led Washington with 61 rushing yards from 17 carries. His workload reflected the Commanders’ efforts to maintain balance alongside their passing attack. Daniels added 52 rushing yards on ten attempts, making him Washington’s second-leading rusher. His mobility created additional options when passing opportunities were limited. However, Chicago restricted Washington’s ability to establish a dominant ground game, particularly when the Commanders needed to protect their late lead. The rushing numbers were respectable, but they did not deliver the same efficiency as Swift’s performance.
Washington Commanders Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Moore | 3 | 46 | 1 |
| Zach Ertz | 6 | 43 | 1 |
| Jaylin Lane | 1 | 37 | 0 |
| Luke McCaffrey | 1 | 33 | 1 |
| Jeremy McNichols | 3 | 30 | 0 |
| Deebo Samuel | 4 | 15 | 0 |
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | 1 | 7 | 0 |
Chris Moore led Washington in receiving yards with 46 on three catches, including a 22-yard touchdown. Zach Ertz recorded a team-high six receptions for 43 yards and scored during the fourth quarter. Luke McCaffrey contributed a 33-yard touchdown reception, while Jaylin Lane gained 37 yards on his only catch. Jeremy McNichols and Deebo Samuel also provided receiving options for Daniels. Although Washington had several productive receivers, the Bears’ defense prevented the Commanders from adding points after their final touchdown.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Team Stats Comparison
| Team Statistic | Bears | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| Final points | 25 | 24 |
| Total net yards | 386 | 329 |
| Passing yards | 252 | 211 |
| Rushing yards by ball carriers | 150 | 124 |
| Passing touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 2 |
| Penalties | 9 | 5 |
| Penalty yards | 84 | 40 |
| Time of possession | 28:26 | 31:34 |
Passing figures are individual quarterback totals before sack deductions; total net yards include sack adjustments.
The team statistics reveal why Chicago managed to win despite trailing late in the fourth quarter. The Bears produced more total offense and avoided losing possession through interceptions or fumbles. Washington held the ball longer and committed fewer penalties, but its three turnovers proved costly. Chicago’s nine penalties resulted in 84 yards, which could have damaged its chances against a team with three passing touchdowns. Ultimately, the Bears’ greater yardage, successful rushing attack, and final possession helped overcome Washington’s advantage in time of possession.
Defensive Player Stats and Key Contributions
Chicago’s defense played an essential role by forcing turnovers that changed the flow of the matchup. Linebacker Tremaine Edmunds recorded 13 combined tackles, while T.J. Edwards contributed nine. The Bears also pressured Daniels and recovered two Washington fumbles. These defensive efforts mattered because Washington had built a strong second-half lead and appeared capable of controlling the final minutes. By creating extra possessions for the offense, Chicago’s defenders prevented the Commanders from converting their scoring advantage into a victory.
One of the most important defensive moments came late in the fourth quarter. Washington was leading 24-22 when a mishandled exchange between Daniels and Jeremy McNichols resulted in a fumble. Cornerback Nahshon Wright recovered the ball at Chicago’s 44-yard line with 3:07 remaining. The turnover gave Williams and Swift an opportunity to reach field-goal range. Without that recovery, Washington could have continued running down the clock. Instead, the Bears gained possession at exactly the moment they needed another scoring drive.
Jake Moody’s Field Goal Performance
Jake Moody was responsible for 13 of Chicago’s 25 points, converting four of five field-goal attempts and his extra-point attempt. His successful field goals came from 47, 48, 41, and 38 yards. Although one attempt was blocked, Moody recovered from that setback to deliver the deciding kick. His performance became especially meaningful because Chicago had elevated him from its practice squad earlier that day to replace injured kicker Cairo Santos. His ability to convert the final attempt turned a narrow deficit into a one-point victory.
The final field goal came after Chicago moved 36 yards on nine plays. Swift was particularly important during that possession, carrying the ball five times for 34 yards. His runs allowed the Bears to improve their position while keeping the offense moving. With the game nearly finished, Moody attempted a 38-yard kick and successfully sent the ball through the uprights. The play immediately ended the contest, giving Chicago a 25-24 victory and completing one of its most memorable comebacks of that regular season.
Important Moments That Changed the Match
The first major turning point came when Chicago established a 13-0 advantage early in the second quarter. Washington gradually responded, beginning with Chris Moore’s touchdown reception. The Commanders then scored twice in the third quarter, including a 33-yard touchdown catch by Luke McCaffrey, to take their first lead. Zach Ertz extended that advantage in the fourth quarter. Chicago’s response came through Swift’s 55-yard receiving touchdown, which narrowed the score to 24-22 despite a failed two-point conversion.
The final turning point involved Washington’s late fumble and Chicago’s ability to capitalize on it. The Bears did not need another touchdown; they needed enough yardage to give Moody a manageable field-goal attempt. Swift’s running provided most of the progress during the last possession. Chicago then relied on its kicker to finish the job. This sequence demonstrated how defensive awareness, efficient rushing, and reliable special teams can decide a football game even when the opposing quarterback has thrown three touchdowns.
Caleb Williams vs Jayden Daniels: Quarterback Comparison
| Statistic | Caleb Williams | Jayden Daniels |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 17 | 19 |
| Attempts | 29 | 26 |
| Passing yards | 252 | 211 |
| Passing touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passer rating | 98.6 | 119.2 |
| Rushing yards | 3 | 52 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Game result | Win | Loss |
Daniels had the stronger touchdown numbers and higher passer rating, while Williams threw for more yards without recording an interception. Daniels was also considerably more productive as a runner. However, Williams contributed a rushing touchdown and delivered the long pass to Swift that helped Chicago begin its final comeback. Both quarterbacks demonstrated their ability to generate points through different styles. The outcome illustrates why individual quarterback statistics do not always determine the winner. Turnovers, defensive stops, rushing efficiency, and field-goal execution also influence the final result.
Previous Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match in 2024
The teams had also played a dramatic contest on October 27, 2024. Washington defeated Chicago 18-15 after Jayden Daniels completed a 52-yard touchdown pass to Noah Brown on the final play. Chicago had briefly taken a 15-12 lead through a Roschon Johnson touchdown and a successful two-point conversion. However, Washington responded with the game-winning throw as time expired. Daniels recorded the decisive passing touchdown, while D’Andre Swift led Chicago’s rushing production with 129 yards, including a 56-yard touchdown run.
The 2025 meeting provided an interesting reversal of that result. In both games, the outcome was decided on the final play, but the winning team changed. Washington claimed the 2024 matchup through a long touchdown pass, while Chicago captured the 2025 contest with a field goal. The games highlighted the developing competition between Williams and Daniels, two quarterbacks selected near the beginning of the 2024 NFL Draft. Their contrasting performances gave supporters of both teams plenty to discuss beyond the final scores.
Why the Chicago Bears Won the 2025 Match
Chicago’s victory came from several connected factors rather than one outstanding individual performance. Swift provided 175 yards from scrimmage, combining his rushing and receiving totals. Williams protected the ball through the passing game and generated important scoring opportunities. The Bears’ defense produced three takeaways, while Washington lost possession twice through fumbles and once through an interception. These mistakes limited the Commanders’ ability to extend their lead despite their successful touchdown passes and longer time of possession.
Chicago also showed the importance of special teams. Moody converted four field goals and scored the final three points, making him one of the decisive figures in the victory. The Bears finished with more net offensive yards even though they committed more penalties. Their ability to recover from an eight-point deficit in the fourth quarter was especially significant. Washington had the passing touchdowns to win, but Chicago made better use of the opportunities created in the closing minutes.
Interesting Facts About the Bears vs Commanders Match
The 2025 matchup included several details that made it memorable. Chicago won 25-24, the same score as its previous game against the Las Vegas Raiders. Moody had been elevated from the practice squad on game day and became the hero with the final field goal. Swift produced more than 100 rushing yards and also caught a long touchdown pass. Daniels threw three touchdowns to three different players, but Washington still lost. Most notably, both the 2024 and 2025 meetings ended with dramatic last-play scores by different winning teams.
Conclusion
The Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats show how a competitive NFL game can be decided by small differences in execution. Chicago secured a 25-24 win through strong rushing from D’Andre Swift, productive passing from Caleb Williams, important defensive takeaways, and Jake Moody’s winning field goal. Washington received an impressive three-touchdown performance from Jayden Daniels, but turnovers prevented the team from protecting its lead. The October 13, 2025 matchup remains a memorable example of how every possession can matter.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders game in 2025?
The Chicago Bears defeated the Washington Commanders 25-24 on October 13, 2025. Jake Moody kicked a 38-yard field goal as time expired to secure the victory.
2. How many passing yards did Caleb Williams record against Washington?
Caleb Williams recorded 252 passing yards, completing 17 of 29 attempts. He finished with one passing touchdown, no interceptions, and a passer rating of 98.6.
3. How did Jayden Daniels perform against the Chicago Bears?
Jayden Daniels completed 19 of 26 passes for 211 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception. He also rushed for 52 yards on ten carries.
4. Who was the leading rusher in the Bears vs Commanders matchup?
D’Andre Swift led both teams with 108 rushing yards on 14 carries. He also contributed 67 receiving yards and one receiving touchdown.
5. What was the biggest turning point in the Bears vs Commanders game?
The decisive turning point was Washington’s late fumble, recovered by Chicago’s Nahshon Wright with 3:07 remaining. Chicago used the resulting possession to set up Moody’s game-winning field goal.
See more amazing Information visit Novira Magazine
